Should I Let My Insurance Replace the Engine & Transmission of My Water-Damaged Car or Mark It as a Total Loss?

Hello people…

I recently encountered a major issue with my car, and I could really use some advice on what to do next.

My car got caught in a flood a couple of weeks ago, and as a result, both the engine and transmission have been severely damaged. After filing a claim with my insurance company, they sent out an adjuster to assess the damage. The adjuster has provided two options:

  1. Replace the Engine and Transmission: They can replace both the engine and transmission. The cost for these repairs will be covered under my comprehensive insurance policy, minus my deductible. The car is only three years old and has been well-maintained until this incident.
  2. Total Loss Settlement: They can mark the car as a total loss and provide a payout based on the current market value of the car. This payout would also account for my deductible.

I’m torn between these two options. Here are a few things I’m considering:

  • Replacement Costs: While the insurance will cover the repair costs, I’m concerned about potential future issues. Will a car that has had such extensive repairs ever be as reliable as it was before?
  • Market Value: The total loss payout seems fair, but I’m not sure if it will be enough to cover the cost of a new or equivalent vehicle, especially given the current car market.
  • Long-Term Reliability: I’ve heard that water damage can cause ongoing problems, even after major components like the engine and transmission are replaced. Has anyone had experience with this? Should I be worried about other hidden issues that might crop up later?
  • Resale Value: If I go the repair route, how will this impact the car’s resale value in the future? Would a car with such significant repairs be worth much less?

Has anyone been in a similar situation or have any advice on which option might be the better long-term decision? I really appreciate any insights you can provide.

Thanks in advance :wink: